|
The Hubble Space Telescope
The Future of Space Travel
In the future, will space travel become as common as the annual family vacation to Disney World?
We've already had several space tourists. The first space tourist in history was Dennis Tito, a multimillionaire who had a dream of going to space and was financially able to make that dream come true. Tito doesn't like being called a space tourist. He prefers to be called an "independent researcher" since he did perform several experiments while on his trip, er, mission.
Dennis Tito made an arrangement with the space tourism company Space Adventures, Ltd., and joined Soyuz TM-32 on April 28, 2001. It was reported that Tito paid $20 million to go on the "mission," but some of his friends say that it was a mere $12 million.
Mark Shuttleworth was the second space tourist to pay for a trip to space. Shuttleworth, another multimillionaire (surprise, surprise) is reported to have paid $20 million for his 2002 space adventure as well. Shuttleworth's space flight was also arranged by Space Adventures, Ltd. He went to space aboard the Russian Soyuz TM-34 mission.
The third space tourist was Gregory Olsen in 2005. Olsen trained as a scientist, and his company produces specialty high-sensitivity cameras. Olsen used his time on the ISS to conduct a number of experiments mostly to test his company's products.
In September 2006, Anousheh Ansari, an Iranian American, went to space aboard Soyuz TMA-9 and became the fourth space tourist. Ms. Ansari prefers to be called a spaceflight participant.
Then on April 7, 2007, Charles Simonyi, an American billionaire of Hungarian descent, became the fifth space tourist when he flew about the Soyuz TMA-10.
Is there a future for the space flight industry? My guess is yes! There have already been five. Prices will decrease as space flight becomes more common, and someday a space vacation will be a viable option.
See Also:
Earth and stars to scale.
Famous Meteorites
The Planet Uranus
William Herschel accidentally discovered the planet Uranus in 1781. Uranus had been seen many times before, but it had always been dismissed as a star.
Uranus is made up mostly of hydrogen and helium like Jupiter and Saturn, but it has higher concentrations of heavy elements. Our closest look at Uranus was given to us by Voyager 2 in 1986.
Uranus is one of the four "Giant Gas Planets" (the other three are Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune). The rings around Uranus are made up of rock, rather than ice like those of Saturn. We do know that there are five large moons and at least 10 smaller moons. The rotational period of Uranus is a little over 17 hours, and its orbital period is 84 years.
Uranus appears to be a giant blue featureless ball. Voyager 2 got relatively close to Uranus and could not pick up any distinguishable features. It is believed that the upper atmosphere of Uranus has a high-level petrochemical haze that probably obscures features lower in the atmosphere. The blue color is caused by methane gas in the atmosphere. Methane gas absorbs red and orange light, which leaves more blue light.
Voyager 2 confirmed that Uranus has a magnetic field. The field is more than 50 times stronger than that of Earth and is tilted about 60 degrees.
The latest scientific data suggests that Uranus is surrounded by at least five rings. The brightest ring is called the Epsilon ring. Voyager 2 located two small shepherd moons for it, one just inside and one just outside. These two shepherd moons have been named Ophelia and Cordelia.
The most interesting moon that circles Uranus is Miranda. Miranda isn't very big, but it has some very interesting geological features. |
|
More articles:
Nicolaus Copernicus, Treaty of Westminster & Carson McCullers
Buying a Telescope
Keith's Moon Planting Page
Astrology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Famous Quotes and Quotations
The Planet Neptune
Mirrors and Lenses
Many people believe that the main function of a telescope is just to make distant celestial objects appear bigger so that astronomers (even amateur astronomers) can see them better, but that really is a misconception. The fact is that telescopes work by gathering light. Magnifying distant objects is secondary. Telescopes gather light basically in two ways: through the use of lenses, and through the use of mirrors. The third way that telescopes gather light is by using a combination of lenses and mirrors.
A telescope that gathers light through the use of a lens is called a refractor telescope. The truth is that how much you spend on a refractor telescope is the determining factor of how well you will be able to see celestial objects. Inexpensive refractor telescopes (2.4 inch) have not-so-good optics and low light grasp. High-end refractor telescopes (3.5 inch) have almost perfect optics and much, much better light grasp.
Telescopes that gather light through the use of a mirror are called reflector telescopes. Refractors cost less per inch of aperture. They are less costly to manufacture because there is only one optical surface, and they lend themselves well to different designs and uses. Also, because the light doesn't have to pass through glass, the images are basically color free. Probably the best telescope for a novice astronomer is the Newtonian reflector. The cost factor is a plus for the refractor telescope, but the corresponding minus (there always is one) is that the primary mirror is ground to a concave shape, so the outside zone has a little longer focal length than the inner zone.
A catadioptic telescope is a compromise between a refractor and a reflector, because both lens and a mirror are used. Catadioptic telescopes are portable. They do not cost as much as a high-quality refractor telescope, but they cost a little more than a good-quality reflector telescope. Still, they are the best of both worlds.
Related Topics: The Planet Uranus,
The Planet Neptune, Inspired by Maria Mitchell
|